Microsoft Maia 300 and Nvidia Rubin target different AI infrastructure needs. Compare their memory, bandwidth, efficiency claims, availability, and deployment options.
The EU is questioning OpenAI and Anthropic over AI agent security incidents, raising questions about the AI Act's reach into model development and testing.
Facebook is rolling out AI controls for Feed and Reels. Learn how ‘Your Algorithm’ lets you shape recommendations and what users should expect from the tools.
Liquid AI releases an open-weight model for local AI agents. Explore its reported performance, hardware requirements, privacy risks and licensing limits.
AMD introduces Helion, an open rack design for agentic AI. Explore CPU and GPU options, planned availability, and what IT teams should assess before deployment.
OpenEvidence and Johns Hopkins Medicine partner to develop AI tools for physician training and clinical care, with a focus on medical reasoning and patient safety.
Workday unveils Work Intelligence to help employers assess AI automation, employee skills, hiring needs and workforce development as job responsibilities evolve.
Epic Games reportedly delays its Disney shooter while pushing AI-generated code and art, raising questions about software quality and development costs.
Gemini Auto Browse can complete multi-step tasks in Chrome, but access is restricted. Learn how to enable it, what it can do, and how to manage permissions and limits.
Bitdeer is expanding its AI infrastructure footprint in Malaysia with a new 67 MW facility designed for NVIDIA Blackwell systems. Here's what's confirmed about its rollout and customer commitments.
Learn how AI guardrails control data access, validate agent actions and filter outputs, plus their limits and the checks IT teams need before deployment.
Anthropic announced that its internal AI models undergoing "high-risk and cybersecurity evaluations" no longer have internet access following incidents involving U.S. government websites at the federal, state, and local levels. [...]
The cyberattacks that shook the South Korean financial sector earlier this month were launched by a Chinese hacker using the ARTEX AI penetration testing suite and Claude agents. [...]
Microsoft Copilot has changed a lot over the past month. Microsoft recently outlined its broader plan for a unified AI experience across Microsoft 365, but it also shipped several new Copilot features users can try right now.
Microsoft rounded up the changes in a recent blog post, highlighting updates across Copilot Chat, Teams, Word, PowerPoint, SharePoint, and OneDrive. The updates expand Copilot to more services and add new features across Microsoft's software suite:
"New design and functionality for Copilot Chat
Plugins, connectors, and Work IQ enhancements to the Copilot App
Teams Phone agent for Copilot in Teams Phone
Citations and image modifications for Copilot in Word
Skills and connectors for Copilot in PowerPoint
General availability for Copilot in SharePoint
General availability for Copilot in OneDrive"
Microsoft outlined several new features, but one stood out to me: citations in Copilot responses.
Copilot can be a useful tool, but it has limits. If you've ever asked Copilot to handle a task that depends on current information, you've probably run into those limits. AI tools can also struggle when interpreting historical, legal, or highly specialized material.
Now, Microsoft Word can show its sources for specific Copilot answers. You can then click the source to confirm the information provided by Copilot.
"Citations in Copilot responses in Word let users see the sources behind Copilot’s answers. Users can view citations to relevant web and work content directly in the response," explains Microsoft.
"This provides greater transparency and helps users understand where Copilot’s information comes from."
Hallucinations are one problem, but AI tools can also misinterpret legitimate sources and present incorrect conclusions. In some cases, an AI tool can misread context and produce an incorrect response. I've had Copilot share the exact opposite of the truth before.
Citations with links allow you to check the source material and make sure Copilot understood the context of the source and extracted the correct information.
Windows Central take
I've found that Copilot (and other AI tools) can make up seemingly authentic sources of information. If you ever use the tool for meaningful work, you need to double-check original sources and assume Copilot will make mistakes.
Of course, that fact could be used to argue that you just should not use Copilot for work. But there's probably a middle ground where Copilot helps draft or gather information while a human verifies the final output.
In general chats with Copilot, you should ask for a source and press Copilot if it continues to speak in generalities. The new feature in Word simplifies that process and ensures that there's a verifiable source of content generated by Copilot.
Join us on Reddit at r/WindowsCentral to share your insights and discuss our latest news, reviews, and more.